We Know How to Do This

With so much media coverage and political debate on the need to reduce our use of fossil fuels, you’d think there must be some very difficult decisions to make, or some very complex new technology required, because for all the talk there doesn’t seem to be much change.

Would it surprise you to learn that there are already eight places in the world with major electricity systems which use almost no fossil fuels?

They have shown us all that it isn’t difficult to power countries using other means. Some of these eight have been like that for decades.

8_places

The one characteristic that all these places have in common is their reliance on hydroelectric dams and/or nuclear power, coupled with some wind and solar. That’s because countries need power all day and all night, and hydro and nuclear can deliver that constant supply.

It’s not difficult, and it’s been done before, eight times. To see how your country measures up you can go to the same place I got my information from, the statistics page at the International Energy Agency.

For those who are interested in numbers, I got all the national data from the IEA link above. Canadian province data is from the National Energy Board. In all cases the data is 2016. I defined “large electricity system” as more than 50 TWh per year. The eight examples range from Switzerland (63 TWh) to France (556 TWh). Between the eight, their electricity is 47% hydro, 41% nuclear, 4% wind, 1% solar and 7% fossil fuel.

There are several smaller countries which also have very clean electricity systems, in fact that’s where I started with this little project. I saw a video from Greenpeace claiming seven countries were running on 100% renewables. The problem was that the video showed cartoons of wind turbines and solar cells, but when I looked at the facts all seven used hydro power, and because they are quite small, they are able to power the whole country with a single technology. (The video only shows national flags for the seven – perhaps to make it difficult to look up the data? But I am naturally curious, and I love looking up flags, so I learned that this other group includes: Bhutan, Nepal, Costa Rica, Albania, Iceland, Ethiopia and Lesotho).

The Greenpeace video challenges the rest of the world to copy the example of those seven small countries. I suppose my diagram at the top of the page has the same message. It’s worth adding that in my home province of Ontario, hydro and nuclear power represent the two cheapest sources of electricity, half the price of wind and a fraction of our natural gas or solar power.

We know how to do this.

10 Comments

  1. Steve Wenner

    The chart has a significant error: wind and fossil are switched – fossil is actually the grey color, and wind is green. The chart looked odd so I checked the figures for France.

    Like

    1. Hi Steve, I appreciate your taking a look. I want to be accurate. I checked my data and it looks right though. I am using the figures from Canada’s federal National Energy Board. The data is 2016 (I guess I could update for 2017 now they have published it). But BC for instance was 88.5% hydro and 1.5% wind in 2016. For France I use the International Energy Agency data, also 2016.
      Which data source are you looking at?

      Like

      1. Steve Wenner

        First thing to pop up in Google: Electricity sector in France. Bottom: The Cruas nuclear power plant at night. The electricity sector in France is dominated by nuclear power, which accounted for 72.3% of total production in 2016, while renewables and fossil fuels accounted for 17.8% and 8.6%, respectively.
        Electricity sector in France – Wikipedia
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_sector_in_France

        Like

  2. Steve Wenner

    It’s more messed up than that: in Quebec the grey slice actually does represent the wind portion.

    Like

    1. I *think* wind is consistently grey… Happy to know if I have made an error, thanks.

      Like

      1. Steve Wenner

        And, could we please color green power green, and dirty power grey?

        Like

  3. Steve Wenner

    And biomass/geothermal is 6% in BC.

    Like

    1. This is a good point. I group all biomass into the “carbon” category with fossil. I should look to see the split between bio and geo (which is genuinely carbon-free)

      Like

  4. Lenka Kollar

    It seems that in your graphic, wind and fossil are switched. Wind should be green. Appreciate if you can double check it.

    Like

    1. Hi Lenka, thanks for looking at the details here – appreciated. I want to be accurate. I checked my data and it looks OK. I am using the Canadian federal National Energy Board 2016 data for Canadian provinces, and the International Energy Agency for data for other countries (also 2016). What data set are you looking at?

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s